A continuation of a documented multi-year, multi-program pattern in which independently created One Man Wolf Pack footage appears across Phoenix TV productions — now including a second, later use of Nairobi recordings derived from the same underlying source material in a separate flagship format.

↗️The Entire 鳳凰衛視 Phoenix Satellite Television (Hong Kong) Case Series – Full Timeline »

Phoenix TV Again and Again: Reuse of the Same Nairobi Drone Footage Across Separate Productions (2023–2025) — A Further Case Study of Repeated B-Roll Reproduction by the Hong Kong Broadcaster 鳳凰衛視

⚖️ Case Study ⚖️

In our previous Nairobi case study, we documented how Phoenix Satellite Television (Phoenix TV, 鳳凰衛視), a Hong Kong-based broadcaster, reproduced portions of our independently produced Nairobi (Kenya) drone footage within its News Talk (新聞今日談) programming in July 2023, and subsequently published that material across multiple Phoenix TV-related platforms, including FengShows.com, ifeng.com, and the YouTube channel “凤凰专区 Phoenix zone” — without any identified license, authorization, or attribution. Notably, the One Man Wolf Pack authorship logo — clearly visible in the original published recordings — was no longer visible in any identified Phoenix TV broadcast version.

That earlier analysis already formed part of a broader cross-continental record, alongside documented reproductions of our ground recordings from Syria (Damascus), our drone and street-level footage from Iran (Tehran), and our drone footage captured in Punta del Este, Uruguay.

🚩 Across all these cases, preserved evidence consistently shows a recurring core pattern: independently produced, high-value drone and ground footage created by Miroslaw Wawak (One Man Wolf Pack) appearing as B-roll within multiple Phoenix TV productions — without any identified license, authorization, or visible attribution.

Taken together with the previously documented ↗️Syria, ↗️Iran and ↗️Uruguay case studies, the earlier ↗️Nairobi (2023) findings already pointed to a cross-continental pattern in which independently created One Man Wolf Pack footage appears repeatedly within Phoenix TV programming without identified license, authorization, or attribution — while visible authorship markers may no longer be present in downstream broadcast versions.

🟥 The present case adds a further dimension to that record: Nairobi footage derived from the same underlying source video — previously identified in a 2023 News Talk (新聞今日談) broadcast — now appears again in a separate production published in February 2025 within Phoenix TV’s flagship Talk With World Leaders (风云对话) format.

ℹ️ As with the prior case studies in this series, all findings are based on preserved evidence (e.g. screen-recordings and screenshots), platform records, and frame-level comparisons.


👉 Nairobi, Kenya — A Second, Later Use by Phoenix Television from Hong Kong (2025)

Further review of productions and publications bearing Phoenix TV branding, or otherwise associated with previously documented Phoenix TV distributions, has identified a second, separate reproduction involving Nairobi footage derived from the same underlying One Man Wolf Pack source footage — this time incorporated into a different program format and production cycle.

🟥 On February 18, 2025, a program titled “Phoenix TV Anchor Nancie Zhu Talks with Mwangi Wachira. 风云对话主持人朱梓橦对话肯尼亚前政府顾问姆旺吉·瓦奇拉。” (Google translation: “Phoenix TV Anchor Nancie Zhu Talks with Mwangi Wachira. In a dialogue with prominent figures, host Zhu Zitong interviewed Mwangi Wachira, a former advisor to the Kenyan government.”) was published on a YouTube channel operating under the branding “Talk With World Leaders Official 鳳凰衛視風雲對話官方” (YouTube handle: @TalkwithWorldLeadersPhoenixTV).

🟥 At the time of review, this YouTube channel was ↗️no longer publicly available. Its role, attribution, and relation to Phoenix TV’s broader production and distribution structure — including how such productions are sourced and published — will be examined in a separate article within this series.

In this broadcast, our Nairobi footage appears beginning at approximately minute 9:50. As in the previously documented 2023 Nairobi case, no license, authorization, or attribution identifying One Man Wolf Pack as the original creator is visible within the program, and the authorship logo — clearly visible in the original source video — is no longer visible in the reproduced broadcast version.

🟥 The red dashed frame highlights the visible frame of the reproduced broadcast version, illustrating how the framing differs from the original source footage — including the region in which the One Man Wolf Pack authorship logo appears in the original recording — a region that is not visible in the reproduced Phoenix TV version.

Screenshot of Nairobi (Kenya) Drone Footage Originally Produced by One Man Wolf Pack Within “Talk With World Leaders” Production — Source: YouTube (archived/downloaded version of youtube.com/watch?v=fuDk6w_rGx)

Screenshot of Original One Man Wolf Pack Nairobi (Kenya) Drone Footage *Logo Appearence Highlighted* — Source: youtube.com/@OneManWolfPack



Screenshot of Nairobi (Kenya) Drone Footage Originally Produced by One Man Wolf Pack Within “Talk With World Leaders” Production — Source: YouTube (archived/downloaded version of youtube.com/watch?v=fuDk6w_rGx)

Screenshot of Original One Man Wolf Pack Nairobi (Kenya) Drone Footage *Logo Appearence Highlighted* — Source: youtube.com/@OneManWolfPack

🚩 Within the broadcast version, the reproduced segments correspond to portions of our original Nairobi recordings; however, the One Man Wolf Pack authorship logo — clearly visible in the original source material — is no longer visible within the displayed frame, while Phoenix TV branding appears on top of the reproduced footage.

🟥 During this segment, on-screen Chinese text reads (AI-extracted): “近年来 一些西方国家 频繁炒作中非合作‘债务陷阱论’ 根据《2023国际债务统计》数据” (AI-translation: “In recent years, some Western countries have frequently promoted the narrative of a ‘debt trap’ in China-Africa cooperation. According to data from the ‘2023 International Debt Statistics’…”)

This context indicates that the Nairobi footage is used as general illustrative B-roll accompanying broader geopolitical and economic commentary, rather than to depict, analyze, or report on the specific location or footage shown. The visual material functions as a generic background layer to the narrative, with no direct relation between the on-screen text and the underlying original footage content.


👉 Program Context and Use of Footage

The format of this production differs from the ↗️previously documented 2023 News Talk (新聞今日談) broadcast. The program follows a studio interview format, featuring Kenyan guest Mwangi Wachira (“former economist at the World Bank and advisor to the Government of Kenya”) and hosted by Phoenix TV's star anchor Nancie Zhu, intercut, among other elements, with illustrative B-roll sequences.

Within this structure, multiple sequences of our original Nairobi drone recordings appear within the program, overlaid with Phoenix TV graphics and Chinese-language captions.

As in the 2023 case:
🟥 no license is identified,
🟥 no authorization is indicated,
🟥 no attribution to Miroslaw Wawak / One Man Wolf Pack is visible within the program,
🟥 the original One Man Wolf Pack authorship mark/logo is no longer visible in the reproduced segments.

🟥 Such divergence is notable especially given Phoenix TV’s public statement on ifengus.com that the company “respects the intellectual property of others and asks that users of our Site do the same,” a position that appears difficult to reconcile with the well-documented, multi-platform reproductions of our works without identified license, authorization, or any visible attribution.


👉 Reuse Across Distinct Program Formats (2023 → 2025)

This second Nairobi case introduces a further relevant distinction:

🚩 footage derived from the same underlying One Man Wolf Pack source material appears across different Phoenix TV productions, in different years, and within different editorial formats:

🟥 2023 → News Talk (新聞今日談)
🟥 2025 → Talk With World Leaders (风云对话)

This distinction indicates that the reproduced material is not limited to a single isolated broadcast instance, but appears reused across separate Phoenix Satellite Television production cycles and program structures.


👉 Technical Characteristics of the Reproduced Footage

Frame-level comparison between the original One Man Wolf Pack recordings and Phoenix TV's broadcast version shows that the reproduced sequences are not identical inserts, but exhibit consistent technical differences.

🚩 In addition to the altered framing already illustrated above, the broadcast material shows Phoenix TV branding and Chinese-language text overlays applied to the footage. These characteristics are consistent with processed broadcast material, rather than direct use of the original source files.


👉 Contextual Use: Illustrative B-Roll

As shown in the extracted on-screen text, the segment addresses broader geopolitical and economic themes related to China–Africa relations.

🚩 Within this context, the Nairobi footage functions as generic illustrative B-roll, used as a visual background layer within the program.

There is no direct connection between:
🟥 the specific content of the on-screen text, and
🟥 the underlying visual material of the original Nairobi recordings by Miroslaw Wawak, used without any identified authorization.


👉 Relation to Earlier Findings

Taken together with the previously documented cases of unauthorized Phoenix TV reproductions involving ↗️Syria, ↗️Iran and ↗️Uruguay, and the earlier Nairobi (2023) reproduction, this additional 2025 use further reinforces the same observable pattern:

🚩 Independently produced footage appears within Phoenix TV programming:
🟥 across multiple continents,
🟥 across multiple years,
🟥 across different program formats — including geopolitical messaging,
🟥 without identified license, authorization, or attribution.


👉 A Repeated Pattern, Not an Isolated Instance

While each individual case can be assessed on its own factual basis, the Nairobi findings — particularly the reuse of the same underlying source material across separate productions — form part of a broader documented sequence.

This sequence includes:

🟥 multiple geographies (Middle East/Asia, South America, Africa),
🟥 multiple editorial formats, and
🟥 repeated use of independently produced creator footage as broadcast B-roll.


👉 Continued Discrepancy with Public Statements

This documented conduct continues to stand in contrast to Phoenix TV’s publicly stated position that it “respects the intellectual property of others.”

Verifact Screenshot of Phoenix TVs Website Terms of Use at ifengus.com — Original Source (Phoenix TV): ifengus.com/c/p/TERMSOFUSE

The repeated use of the same source video across separate productions raises further questions regarding:

🟥 internal content sourcing practices of Phoenix Satellite Television,
🟥 editorial review processes, and
🟥 copyright compliance across different production units and formats.




⏭️ Coming Next: Additional Documented Instances

In upcoming posts, we will publish further preserved evidence (URLs, timestamps, screenshots, and platform records) relating to:

🟥 Documented unauthorized use of our U.S. Copyright Office-registered Taiwan footage in politically framed segments by Phoenix TV,
🟥 Additional unlicensed uses of our work involving locations including Singapore, Malaysia, and also Macau and mainland China,
🟥 A multi-year timeline of all identified and repeated unauthorized uses,
🟥 More related correspondence and statements made by Phoenix TV, e.g. in DMCA counter-notifications,
🟥 Phoenix TV’s distribution status in Taiwan (as publicly reported since 2022),
🟥 Mass deletions across Phoenix TV-affiliated YouTube channels following our DMCA enforcement,
🟥 Phoenix TV’s YouTube channel rebranding (and the relevant YouTube policy implications) and
🟥 A deep dive into Phoenix TV’s flagship programs — including “Talk With World Leaders” (风云对话), “GBA Discovery” (發現大灣區) and other political/feature formats — and what their repeated reliance on unlicensed creator footage reveals about the broadcaster’s copyright governance and editorial standards.

⚖️ Our documentation continues.

🐾 As always, we keep this factual record public for accuracy, fairness, and accountability. More updates will follow.


🔖 Read also: Further documented cases of Phoenix TV’s unauthorized reproductions of One Man Wolf Pack footage:

👉 Phoenix TV Again: Our Authorship Mark Is No Longer Visible in Further Unlicensed Drone Footage Use — The Nairobi, Kenya Case Study
👉 Phoenix TV Reproduced Our Recordings Without Authorization Once More — A Further Case Study in a Long-Standing Pattern of B-Roll Re-Use by the Hong Kong Broadcaster, Mirroring Practices Previously Documented at CCTV
👉 Phoenix TV’s Unauthorized Reproductions of One Man Wolf Pack’s Iran Footage
👉 Phoenix TV used Damascus footage without authorization, despite Fu Xiaotian’s 2015 on-site reporting with a full camera crew, raising questions about the broadcaster's public “IP respect” claims


👉 Summary of the Article

This article documents a further instance of Phoenix Satellite Television’s use of One Man Wolf Pack footage without identified license, authorization, or attribution, focusing again on Nairobi, Kenya. Building on the previously documented 2023 “News Talk” (新聞今日談) case, it presents evidence of a second, later use of Nairobi drone recordings derived from the same underlying source material, now appearing within a separate production published in February 2025 as part of Phoenix TV’s flagship “Talk With World Leaders” (风云对话) format.

Based on preserved evidence including archived video material, frame-level comparisons, and platform records, the article shows how multiple sequences of the original Nairobi recordings are incorporated as illustrative B-roll within a studio interview context, overlaid with Phoenix TV branding and Chinese-language text. As in prior cases, no license is identified, no authorization is indicated, no attribution to One Man Wolf Pack is visible, and, in this instance, the original authorship logo — clearly present in the Nairobi source material — is not visible in the broadcast version.

In contrast to the specific geopolitical and economic themes presented in the segment, the reproduced footage functions as generic illustrative B-roll, with no direct relation between the on-screen content and the underlying visual material. The Nairobi case further demonstrates that footage derived from the same source video can appear across different Phoenix TV productions, years, and editorial formats — extending a documented pattern previously identified across Syria, Iran, Uruguay, and earlier Kenya material.

By placing these findings alongside Phoenix TV’s public statement that it “respects the intellectual property of others,” this case study highlights a continued discrepancy between stated policy and observed and documented practice, raising further questions regarding internal content sourcing, editorial review processes, and copyright compliance across different production units and formats.

Additional documented instances — including further uses of One Man Wolf Pack footage relating to Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, Macau, and mainland China, as well as deeper analysis of Phoenix TV’s program structures and distribution channels — will be published as part of this ongoing public record.

#RealJustice #RealTruth #RealTransparency #OneManWolfPack #ContentCreators

Keywords: Phoenix TV Nairobi drone footage reuse, Phoenix Satellite Television B-roll reproduction, Talk With World Leaders 风云对话 footage use, Nairobi Kenya drone video unauthorized use, same source footage reuse case study, authorship logo not visible broadcast, Chinese state media B-roll usage pattern, Hong Kong broadcaster copyright compliance, One Man Wolf Pack Miroslaw Wawak, cross-program footage reuse Phoenix TV, unlicensed creator footage documentation, Nairobi drone footage 2025 publication


ℹ️ Note: The following summaries are AI translations provided for accessibility. In case of any discrepancy, the English version prevails.

EspañolResumen en Español (traducida por AI)

Este artículo documenta un nuevo caso del uso por parte de Phoenix Satellite Television de material de One Man Wolf Pack sin licencia, autorización o atribución identificada, centrándose nuevamente en Nairobi, Kenia. Partiendo del caso previamente documentado de 2023 en el programa “News Talk” (新聞今日談), presenta evidencia de un segundo uso posterior de grabaciones de drones de Nairobi derivadas del mismo material fuente subyacente, que ahora aparecen dentro de una producción separada publicada en febrero de 2025 como parte del programa insignia de Phoenix TV “Talk With World Leaders” (风云对话).

Basado en evidencia preservada que incluye material de video archivado, comparaciones cuadro por cuadro y registros de plataformas, el artículo muestra cómo múltiples secuencias de las grabaciones originales de Nairobi se incorporan como B-roll ilustrativo dentro de un contexto de entrevista en estudio, superpuestas con la marca de Phoenix TV y texto en chino. Como en casos anteriores, no se identifica ninguna licencia, no se indica autorización, no se observa atribución a One Man Wolf Pack y, en este caso concreto, el logotipo original de autoría — claramente presente en el material fuente de Nairobi — no es visible en la versión emitida.

En contraste con los temas geopolíticos y económicos abordados en el segmento, el material reproducido funciona como B-roll ilustrativo genérico, sin relación directa entre el contenido en pantalla y el material visual subyacente. El caso de Nairobi demuestra además que material derivado de la misma fuente puede aparecer en diferentes producciones, años y formatos editoriales de Phoenix TV, ampliando un patrón previamente documentado en Siria, Irán, Uruguay y el caso anterior de Kenia.

Al contrastar estos hallazgos con la declaración pública de Phoenix TV de que “respects the intellectual property of others”, este estudio de caso pone de relieve una discrepancia continua entre la política declarada y la práctica observada y documentada, planteando nuevas preguntas sobre los procesos internos de obtención de contenido, revisión editorial y cumplimiento de derechos de autor.

Se publicarán instancias adicionales documentadas — incluyendo usos en Taiwán, Singapur, Malasia, Macao y China continental — como parte de este registro público en curso.

Palabras clave: Phoenix TV Nairobi drone footage reuse, Phoenix Satellite Television reproducción B-roll, Talk With World Leaders 风云对话 uso de material, Nairobi Kenya drone video uso no autorizado, reutilización mismo material fuente, logo autoría no visible, patrón B-roll China-Africa, cumplimiento copyright broadcaster Hong Kong, One Man Wolf Pack Miroslaw Wawak


PortuguêsResumo em Português (traduzido por IA)

Este artigo documenta um novo caso de uso por parte da Phoenix Satellite Television de imagens da One Man Wolf Pack sem licença, autorização ou atribuição identificada, novamente com foco em Nairobi, Quênia. Com base no caso previamente documentado de 2023 no programa “News Talk” (新聞今日談), apresenta evidências de um segundo uso posterior de gravações de drone de Nairobi derivadas do mesmo material original, agora inseridas em uma produção separada publicada em fevereiro de 2025 como parte do programa principal da Phoenix TV “Talk With World Leaders” (风云对话).

Com base em evidências preservadas — incluindo material de vídeo arquivado, comparações quadro a quadro e registros de plataforma — o artigo demonstra como múltiplas sequências das gravações originais de Nairobi são utilizadas como B-roll ilustrativo em um contexto de entrevista em estúdio, com sobreposição de branding da Phoenix TV e textos em chinês. Como nos casos anteriores, nenhuma licença é identificada, nenhuma autorização é indicada, nenhuma atribuição à One Man Wolf Pack é visível e, neste caso específico, o logotipo original de autoria — claramente presente no material original — não é visível na versão transmitida.

Em contraste com os temas geopolíticos e econômicos apresentados, o material reproduzido funciona como B-roll ilustrativo genérico, sem relação direta entre o conteúdo exibido e o material visual original. O caso de Nairobi demonstra ainda que imagens derivadas do mesmo material fonte podem aparecer em diferentes produções, anos e formatos editoriais da Phoenix TV, reforçando um padrão já documentado envolvendo Síria, Irã, Uruguai e o caso anterior do Quênia.

Ao comparar essas conclusões com a declaração pública da Phoenix TV de que “respects the intellectual property of others”, este estudo destaca uma discrepância contínua entre política declarada e prática observada e documentada, levantando questões sobre processos internos, revisão editorial e conformidade com direitos autorais.

Outros casos documentados — incluindo Taiwan, Singapura, Malásia, Macau e China continental — serão publicados como parte deste registro contínuo.

Palavras-chave: Phoenix TV Nairobi drone footage reuse, uso não autorizado Phoenix Satellite Television, B-roll Talk With World Leaders, vídeo drone Nairobi uso indevido, reutilização mesma fonte, logo autoria não visível, padrão B-roll mídia chinesa, compliance copyright Hong Kong, One Man Wolf Pack Miroslaw Wawak


DeutschZusammenfassung auf Deutsch (KI-übersetzt)

Dieser Artikel dokumentiert einen weiteren Fall der Nutzung von Aufnahmen von One Man Wolf Pack durch Phoenix Satellite Television ohne identifizierte Lizenz, Autorisierung oder Namensnennung, erneut mit Fokus auf Nairobi, Kenia. Aufbauend auf dem zuvor dokumentierten Fall aus dem Jahr 2023 im Programm „News Talk“ (新聞今日談) werden Belege für eine zweite, spätere Nutzung von Drohnenaufnahmen aus Nairobi präsentiert, die aus demselben zugrunde liegenden Ausgangsmaterial stammen und nun in einer separaten, im Februar 2025 veröffentlichten Produktion im Rahmen des Phoenix-TV-Flaggschiffprogramms „Talk With World Leaders“ (风云对话) erscheinen.

Basierend auf gesicherten Beweisen — einschließlich archiviertem Videomaterial, Frame-by-Frame-Vergleichen und Plattformdaten — zeigt der Artikel, wie mehrere Sequenzen der ursprünglichen Nairobi-Aufnahmen als illustratives B-Roll in einen Studiointerview-Kontext eingebettet sind, überlagert mit Phoenix-TV-Branding und chinesischen Textelementen. Wie in früheren Fällen wird keine Lizenz identifiziert, keine Autorisierung angegeben, keine Zuordnung zu One Man Wolf Pack sichtbar gemacht, und in diesem konkreten Fall ist auch das ursprüngliche Urheberlogo — im Originalmaterial klar sichtbar — in der ausgestrahlten Version nicht erkennbar.

Im Gegensatz zu den im Segment behandelten geopolitischen und wirtschaftlichen Themen fungiert das verwendete Material als generisches B-Roll ohne direkten Bezug zwischen Inhalt und Bildmaterial. Der Fall Nairobi zeigt zudem, dass Material aus derselben Quelle über verschiedene Produktionen, Jahre und Formate hinweg verwendet wird, was ein bereits dokumentiertes Muster aus Syrien, Iran, Uruguay und dem früheren Kenia-Fall fortsetzt.

Im Vergleich zu Phoenix TVs eigener Aussage, man „respects the intellectual property of others“, zeigt diese Fallstudie eine anhaltende Diskrepanz zwischen deklarierter Position und beobachteter sowie dokumentierter Praxis und wirft Fragen zu internen Prozessen und Urheberrechts-Compliance auf.

Weitere dokumentierte Fälle — u. a. Taiwan, Singapur, Malaysia, Macau und Festlandchina — werden folgen.

Schlüsselwörter: Phoenix TV Nairobi Drohnenaufnahmen Wiederverwendung, unlizenzierte Nutzung Phoenix Satellite Television, B-Roll Verwendung, Nairobi Drohnenvideo Nutzung, gleiches Quellmaterial, Urheberlogo nicht sichtbar, Muster chinesischer Mediennutzung, One Man Wolf Pack Miroslaw Wawak


FrancaisRésumé en français (traduction par IA)

Cet article documente un nouveau cas d’utilisation par Phoenix Satellite Television de contenus de One Man Wolf Pack sans licence, autorisation ou attribution identifiée, en se concentrant à nouveau sur Nairobi, au Kenya. S’appuyant sur le cas précédemment documenté en 2023 dans l’émission « News Talk » (新聞今日談), il présente des éléments attestant d’une seconde utilisation ultérieure d’images de drone de Nairobi, issues du même matériel source sous-jacent, désormais intégrées dans une production distincte publiée en février 2025 dans le cadre du programme phare de Phoenix TV « Talk With World Leaders » (风云对话).

Sur la base de preuves conservées — notamment des vidéos archivées, des comparaisons image par image et des données issues des plateformes — l’article montre que plusieurs séquences des enregistrements originaux de Nairobi sont utilisées comme B-roll illustratif dans un contexte d’entretien en studio, avec superposition de l’identité visuelle de Phoenix TV et de textes en chinois. Comme dans les cas précédents, aucune licence n’est identifiée, aucune autorisation n’est indiquée, aucune attribution à One Man Wolf Pack n’est visible et, dans ce cas précis, le logo d’auteur — clairement présent dans le matériel source — n’est pas visible dans la version diffusée.

Contrairement aux thématiques géopolitiques et économiques abordées dans le segment, les images reproduites sont utilisées comme B-roll illustratif générique, sans lien direct entre le contenu affiché à l’écran et le matériel visuel d’origine. Le cas de Nairobi démontre en outre que des images issues d’un même matériel source peuvent apparaître dans différentes productions, à différentes années et sous divers formats éditoriaux de Phoenix TV, prolongeant un schéma déjà observé dans les cas concernant la Syrie, l’Iran, l’Uruguay et le Kenya.

En mettant ces constats en perspective avec la déclaration publique de Phoenix TV selon laquelle elle « respects the intellectual property of others », cette étude de cas met en évidence une divergence persistante entre la politique affichée et la pratique observée, soulevant des questions supplémentaires quant aux processus internes d’acquisition de contenu, de révision éditoriale et de conformité en matière de droits d’auteur.

D’autres cas documentés — notamment concernant Taïwan, Singapour, la Malaisie, Macao et la Chine continentale — seront publiés dans le cadre de ce registre public en cours.

Mots-clés: Phoenix TV Nairobi images drone réutilisation, Phoenix Satellite Television utilisation non autorisée, B-roll Talk With World Leaders 风云对话, vidéo drone Nairobi Kenya utilisation sans licence, réutilisation même matériel source, logo auteur non visible diffusion, utilisation B-roll médias chinois Afrique, conformité droits d’auteur Hong Kong broadcaster, One Man Wolf Pack Miroslaw Wawak, réutilisation multi-programmes Phoenix TV, documentation utilisation contenu créateur non autorisé, vidéo drone Nairobi publication 2025


Chinese文章摘要 (简体中文) (AI翻译)

本文记录了凤凰卫视在未识别许可、授权或署名的情况下再次使用 One Man Wolf Pack 影像素材的一个新案例,并再次聚焦肯尼亚内罗毕。在此前已记录的 2023 年《新闻今日谈》案例基础上,本文提供证据表明:源自同一底层原始素材的内罗毕无人机影像被再次使用,并出现在一项于 2025 年 2 月发布的独立节目中,该节目属于凤凰卫视旗舰栏目《风云对话》。

基于已保存的证据(包括归档视频资料、逐帧比对以及平台记录),本文显示:原始内罗毕影像的多个片段被作为说明性 B-roll 嵌入演播室访谈内容中,并叠加凤凰卫视品牌标识及中文字幕。如同此前案例,未发现任何许可或授权信息,也未见对 One Man Wolf Pack 的署名;并且在本案例中,原始素材中清晰可见的作者标识在播出版本中不可见。

与节目中涉及的中非地缘政治与经济议题相比,该影像仅作为通用的说明性背景画面使用,与具体画面内容并无直接关联。内罗毕案例进一步表明,来源于同一素材的影像可以在不同年份、不同节目形式及不同制作中重复出现,从而延续了此前在叙利亚、伊朗、乌拉圭及肯尼亚案例中已记录的模式。

将这些发现与凤凰卫视公开声明其“尊重他人知识产权”的立场进行对比,可以看出其公开政策与实际观察到的做法之间持续存在差异,并进一步引发对其内容获取流程、编辑审核机制以及版权合规性的质疑。

更多已记录的相关案例——包括涉及台湾、新加坡、马来西亚、澳门及中国大陆的使用情况——将作为本持续公开记录的一部分陆续发布。

關鍵詞: 凤凰卫视 内罗毕 无人机影像 再利用, Phoenix TV 未授权使用 素材, 风云对话 B-roll 使用, 内罗毕 肯尼亚 无人机视频 未授权, 相同来源素材 重复使用, 作者标识 不可见 播出版本, 中国媒体 B-roll 使用 模式, 香港媒体 版权合规 问题, One Man Wolf Pack 米罗斯拉夫 瓦瓦克, 凤凰卫视 跨节目素材使用, 创作者内容 未授权使用 记录, 内罗毕 无人机影像 2025 发布


Japanese日本語での要約 (AI翻訳)

本記事は、Phoenix Satellite Television による One Man Wolf Pack の映像の使用について、ライセンス、許可、またはクレジット表示が確認されていない新たな事例を記録するものであり、再びケニア・ナイロビに焦点を当てています。2023年に記録された「News Talk(新聞今日談)」の事例を基に、本稿では同一の元素材に由来するナイロビのドローン映像が再度使用され、2025年2月に公開された別の制作物として、Phoenix TV の主要番組「Talk With World Leaders(风云对话)」内に登場していることを示しています。

保存された証拠(アーカイブ映像、フレーム単位の比較、プラットフォーム記録)に基づき、本記事は、元のナイロビ映像の複数のシーケンスがスタジオインタビューの文脈においてBロールとして使用され、Phoenix TV のブランド表示および中国語テキストが重ねられていることを示しています。これまでの事例と同様に、ライセンスは確認されず、許可も示されておらず、One Man Wolf Pack へのクレジットも表示されていません。また本件においては、元映像に明確に存在する作者ロゴも放送版では確認できません。

番組内で扱われる地政学的・経済的テーマとは対照的に、この映像は一般的な説明用Bロールとして使用されており、画面上の内容と元の映像素材との間に直接的な関連はありません。本件は、同一の素材に由来する映像が異なる年、異なる番組形式、異なる制作において再利用され得ることを示しており、シリア、イラン、ウルグアイおよび以前のケニアの事例で確認されたパターンをさらに裏付けるものです。

これらの事実を、Phoenix TV が「他者の知的財産を尊重する」と公に表明している方針と比較すると、声明と実際の運用との間に継続的な乖離が見られ、コンテンツ取得プロセス、編集体制、著作権遵守の在り方についてさらなる疑問を提起します。

今後、台湾、シンガポール、マレーシア、マカオ、中国本土に関連する追加事例についても、本公開記録の一環として順次公開される予定です。

キーワード: Phoenix TV ナイロビ ドローン映像 再利用, Phoenix Satellite Television 無断使用, Talk With World Leaders 风云对话 Bロール使用, ナイロビ ケニア ドローン動画 無許可使用, 同一素材 再利用 ケース, 著作権ロゴ 非表示 放送版, 中国メディア Bロール使用パターン, 香港放送局 著作権コンプライアンス, One Man Wolf Pack ミロスワフ ワヴァク, Phoenix TV 複数番組 映像再利用, クリエイターコンテンツ 無断使用 記録, ナイロビ ドローン映像 2025 公開


About the Author

Miroslaw Wawak is a world-traveling filmmaker, drone pilot, and founder of One Man Wolf Pack — also internationally known from the Netflix production “Crime Scene Berlin: Nightlife Killer” (↗️IMDb), where his story was featured as a survivor and main protagonist. Having explored and documented 222 countries, his original and unique aerial footage has been featured in international media, Hollywood trailers, and major global events.

Beyond his creative work, Miroslaw is a passionate advocate for creator rights, transparency, and social impactregularly supporting community projects and defending his original work against unauthorized use worldwide. He’s taken legal action against everyone from international broadcasters (e.g. ESPN, TyC Sports) and tech giants (e.g. Facebook, YouTube) to national icons (e.g. Deutsche Welle, Globo, BAND/Radio Bandeirantes) — even religious institutions — in matters involving documented disputes over unauthorized use of his copyrighted works.

Through exposing countless violations of his copyright and collaborating with top intellectual property attorneys around the globe — including landmark legal battles from Europe to the Americas and as far as Bermuda — Miroslaw Wawak has acquired an unmatched expertise in defending his rights and bringing every discovered infringement to justice.

🟥 His most recent victories in ↗️precedent-setting cases against the BAND network and ↗️Carolina Britto in Brazil as well as ↗️Rafael Delgado Garcia (Spain/Andorra) proved not only the financial strength but also the strategic determination and consistent enforcement behind his enforcement efforts.


ℹ️ Note: All lawsuits and legal proceedings on Brazilian soil
including against YouTube (Google), Facebook (Meta) and major broadcasters —

are fully disclosed here: ↗️ Escavador Profile
Recommendation: Save your digital evidences with ↗️ Verifact (in accordance with ISO/IEC 27037:2013)️️

↑ Back to Top


This article examines Phoenix TV’s repeated unauthorized reproduction of One Man Wolf Pack’s copyrighted footage in Kenya-related broadcasts — including footage from Nairobi. Statements of opinion and commentary are based on the documented materials referenced. Furthermore, this article is based on documented events, personal experiences, and publicly available sources. It is intended as commentary on matters of public interest and copyright protection. No statement herein is intended to accuse any party of unlawful conduct beyond what is factually substantiated. Where legal proceedings are pending or contemplated, no statement is presented as a final judicial determination.


Our Statement of Disassociation | Chinese Propaganda

Read the full article on this infringement of our copyright »

🟥 Featured on medium.com:
REUTERS EPIC FAIL
»

🟥 Featured on CopyCatTV.com:
How CCTV Lied Under Oath
»

🟥 Phoenix Satellite Television (HK):
Case Series – Full Timeline
»

Drone Footage Licensing One Man Wolf Pack

»Buy 4K Drone RAW Footage
Stock from 160+ Countries | 2026

»Full 4K (Drone) Video List »

Search 🔍

 Search also in description

»News Archive   »Crime Scene Berlin

Quick Links 🔥

»Miroslaw Wawak Social Projects
Supporting the Homeless of Rio de Janeiro

»Miroslaw Wawak @ Netflix

Stadium Drone Footage Licensing One Man Wolf Pack

»Stadium Drone Videos
Arenas Groundhopping

 
Follow The Wolf Pack ★★★★★
Follow the One Man Wolf Pack on YouTube
Follow the One Man Wolf Pack on YouTube
 
 
 

Miroslaw Wawak
One Man Wolf Pack
Paraguay
© Copyright Information


»Full Site Notice | © One Man Wolf Pack 2026

Page Views: 307

»My Tibet Tour with Tibet Vista
»Unauthorized Use of Our Footage in State Media Broadcasts and Propaganda
»Reuters Under Fire for Distributing Chinese Military Propaganda with Copyrighted Drone Footage
»DMCA Abuse, Copyright Theft, and the Great CCTV Scandal
»The Propaganda Has Arrived at Our Doorstep: Brazilian Network RECORD Publishes Chinese Military Propaganda—Depicting Taipei as a Target
»One Man Wolf Pack Brings Down CCTV: A Historic Takedown of State Propaganda by Civilian Copyright Strikes
»Reuters, Record and the Art of Burning Together
»BAND Falls Hard: Brazilian Broadcaster Loses Copyright Lawsuit Over Unauthorized Drone Footage
»Spanish Court Confirms Copyright Infringement by Rafael Delgado García – The Beginning of the End for a Global Content Theft Empire
»Brazilian Court Confirms Copyright Infringement by Carolina Pintos de Britto — Full Victory for One Man Wolf Pack in Landmark Drone Footage Case
»The BAND Network: How One of Brazil’s Biggest Broadcasters Lost a Major YouTube Channel — and Why It Matters
»CGTN: “We Truly Value Your Work”… While Stealing It
»Nippon TV (Japan) & the PLA Propaganda Chain — A Surprising Twist After an Apology
»TyC Sports — Latin America’s Largest Copyright-Theft Operation Keeps Stealing, Even After Being Sued and Nearly Losing Their YouTube Channel
»CopyCatTV.com — Case Study: How CCTV Lied Under Oath in the U.S. DMCA System
»Phoenix TV used Damascus footage without authorization, despite Fu Xiaotian’s 2015 on-site reporting with a full camera crew, raising questions about the broadcaster's public “IP respect” claims
»Phoenix TV’s Unauthorized Reproductions of One Man Wolf Pack’s Iran Footage
»Phoenix TV Reproduced Our Recordings Without Authorization Once More — A Further Case Study in a Long-Standing Pattern of B-Roll Re-Use by the Hong Kong Broadcaster, Mirroring Practices Previously Documented at CCTV
»Phoenix TV Again: Our Authorship Mark Is No Longer Visible in Further Unlicensed Drone Footage Use — The Nairobi, Kenya Case Study
»Phoenix TV Again and Again: Reuse of the Same Nairobi Drone Footage Across Separate Productions (2023–2025) — A Further Case Study of Repeated B-Roll Reproduction by the Hong Kong Broadcaster 鳳凰衛視