One Man Wolf Pack Blog · 鳳凰衛視 Phoenix Satellite Television (Hong Kong) Case Series – Full Timeline »


🚨 Last updated: 2026-03-24 18:30 | This case series documents a multi-year pattern of unauthorized use of One Man Wolf Pack’s copyrighted works by Phoenix Satellite Television (鳳凰衛視 — Phoenix TV of Hong Kong). Based on preserved digital evidence (including screenshots and screencasts created with Verifact® — a tool used for the secure preservation of online evidence and previously relied upon in court proceedings, including in Brazil against BAND and RECORD), platform records, confirmations and related documentation, and frame-level analysis, we have documented multiple reproductions of ground footage and high-value drone recordings across more than eight countries and over a period exceeding five years. The affected locations include, among others, ↗️Syria, ↗️Iran, ↗️Uruguay, ↗️Kenya, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, Macau, and mainland China. Across these cases, independently created footage was incorporated into Phoenix TV programming on multiple occasions as illustrative B-rollwithout any identified license, authorization, or visible attribution to the original creator, Miroslaw Wawak (One Man Wolf Pack).

🇨🇳🇭🇰 Who is Phoenix TV?: Phoenix Satellite Television (“Phoenix TV”) is a Hong Kong-based broadcaster with international distribution across television and digital platforms, including YouTube and affiliated online services. The network has been widely described in public reporting and academic analysis as reflecting pro-Beijing editorial perspectives, particularly in its geopolitical and international coverage:

🟥 “(…) Phoenix TV’s content is subject to the dictates of the leadership of the CCP Central Committee’s Propaganda Department, the CCP Central Committee’s Overseas Propaganda Office, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (…)” [source: chinascope.org/archives/22625]

⚖️ Legal action concerning 鳳凰衛視 Phoenix Satellite Television: Following DMCA enforcement, extensive documentation, formal letters and, ultimately, unsuccessful settlement discussions, including with Phoenix TV's legal counsel in the United States, Miroslaw Wawak has initiated and is continuing preparations for formal legal action in multiple jurisdictions in relation to, among other matters, what we assert to be Phoenix TV’s unauthorized use of our copyrighted works. These proceedings concern multiple documented instances of what we assert to constitute copyright infringement, based on preserved evidence, platform records and DMCA enforcement confirmations, frame-level analysis, and Phoenix TV's written acknowledgment that certain programmes/videos contained our air drone footages without prior authorisation. Phoenix TV communicated via email, dated 31 August 2025:

📩↗️ “(…) We confirmed that all such programmes/videos have contained air drone footages produced by your good self without your prior authorisation and we apologise for that. (…)”

👉 The documented instances span multiple program formats (including Phoenix TV flagship shows like Talk With World Leaders (风云对话)), as well as multiple production cycles and distribution channels, including broadcast segments containing our works, YouTube publications, and affiliated digital platforms like FengShows and ifeng. Taken together, these findings indicate a cross-continental pattern of repeated content reuse without identified license, authorization, or attribution — partly with our original Copyright Management Information (e.g. our company logo) no longer visible — involving independently produced creator footage within Phoenix TV’s programming ecosystem.

💥 DMCA + YouTube channel terminations: Parallel to these developments, a series of copyright enforcement actions by Miroslaw Wawak (One Man Wolf Pack) under the DMCA framework led to the removal of multiple publications identified as being associated with Phoenix TV and ultimately contributed to the termination of multiple YouTube channels bearing Phoenix TV branding (e.g. ↗️“鳳凰衛視PhoenixTV) or otherwise associated with previously documented distributions. Notably, prior to the enforcement measures fully taking effect, observable changes in Phoenix TV channel branding and publication structure were identified, raising further questions regarding compliance with platform policies on YouTube and general content governance.

🚩 Content sourcing / editorial pattern: Across the documented cases, independently produced footage appears integrated into Phoenix TV programming as illustrative B-roll across multiple formats and editorial contexts, oftentimes involving geopolitical, Pro-China messaging. This raises broader questions regarding Phoenix TV's internal content sourcing practices, editorial review processes, and copyright compliance within large-scale broadcast operations — particularly in light of publicly stated policies such as “Company respects the intellectual property of others and asks that users of our Site do the same.”.

🆚 Forward-looking: The present timeline serves as an overview of documented findings to date. Dedicated follow-up analyses and additional case studies will further examine specific aspects in much greater detail, including platform distribution structures, channel-level enforcement history, and the broader implications for copyright governance in international broadcast media. At the same time, this case series forms part of a broader commitment to transparency and creator empowerment — documenting real-world enforcement processes, evidentiary standards, and outcomes to support independent creators in understanding and protecting their rights.

🟥 Why it matters: Copyright protection for videography plays a fundamental role in recognizing the time, investment, and creative effort required to produce original footage — particularly in the field of high-end aerial and drone cinematography. Independent creators like Miroslaw Wawak (One Man Wolf Pack) invest significant resources to capture unique perspectives that are not easily replicable. Upholding copyright standards ensures that such work is properly attributed, licensed, and respected, and helps maintain a fair environment for creators operating in a global digital media landscape.

Phoenix TV Again and Again: Reuse of the Same Nairobi Drone Footage Across Separate Productions (2023–2025) — A Further Case Study of Repeated B-Roll Reproduction by the Hong Kong Broadcaster 鳳凰衛視

⚖️ Case Study ⚖️

In our previous Nairobi case study, we documented how Phoenix Satellite Television (Phoenix TV, 鳳凰衛視), a Hong Kong-based broadcaster, reproduced portions of our independently produced Nairobi (Kenya) drone footage within its News Talk (新聞今日談) programming in July 2023, and subsequently published that material across multiple Phoenix TV-related platforms, including FengShows.com, ifeng.com, and the YouTube channel “凤凰专区 Phoenix zone” — without any identified license, authorization, or attribution. Notably, the One Man Wolf Pack authorship logo — clearly visible in the original published recordings — was no longer visible in any identified Phoenix TV broadcast version.

That earlier analysis already formed part of a broader cross-continental record, alongside documented reproductions of our ground recordings from Syria (Damascus), our drone and street-level footage from Iran (Tehran), and our drone footage captured in Punta del Este, Uruguay.

Picture: Aerial view of Nairobi — Original sequence filmed by One Man Wolf Pack ©

*PINNED*2026-03-22 23:00Read the full article »

Phoenix TV Again: Our Authorship Mark Is No Longer Visible in Further Unlicensed Drone Footage Use — The Nairobi, Kenya Case Study

⚖️ Case Study ⚖️

In our previous report on Phoenix TV’s reproductions of our Uruguay footage, we documented how the Hong Kong broadcaster again relied on independently created One Man Wolf Pack recordings as B-roll without any identified license, attribution, or authorization. That case concerned the use of various Punta del Este drone sequences far removed from the conflict-oriented contexts examined in earlier Syria and Iran case studies.

The Uruguay analysis identified five distinct drone sequences matching our original recordings, in which Phoenix TV overlaid its own broadcast graphics while the visible One Man Wolf Pack authorship mark (logo) — present and clearly visible in the original source material — was no longer visible in Phoenix TV’s published versions following frame-level modification or other broadcast processing.

Picture: Aerial view of Nairobi — Original sequence filmed by One Man Wolf Pack ©

*PINNED**UPDATED* 2026-03-24 14:45Read the full article »

Phoenix TV Reproduced Our Recordings Without Authorization Once More — A Further Case Study in a Long-Standing Pattern of B-Roll Re-Use by the Hong Kong Broadcaster, Mirroring Practices Previously Documented at CCTV

⚖️ Case Study ⚖️

In two prior articles in this series, we documented a recurring pattern in which third-party creator footage appears in programming of Phoenix Satellite Television (Phoenix TV of Hong Kong) without identified license, attribution, or authorization, based exclusively on preserved evidence, public records, and Phoenix TV’s own publications.

First, in “Phoenix TV used Damascus footage without authorization, despite Fu Xiaotian’s 2015 on-site reporting with a full camera crew, raising questions about the broadcaster's public ‘IP respect’ claims,” we showed how Phoenix TV incorporated One Man Wolf Pack’s Damascus recordings into multiple Syria-related productions — despite Phoenix TV’s own public reporting confirming that its team had on-site access in Damascus in 2015.

Picture: Aerial view of Punta del Este — Original sequence filmed by One Man Wolf Pack ©

*PINNED*2026-01-21 18:30Read the full article »

Phoenix TV’s Unauthorized Reproductions of One Man Wolf Pack’s Iran Footage

⚖️ Case Study ⚖️

After documenting Phoenix TV’s unauthorized reproductions of our 2019 Damascus, Syria recordings – footage gathered amid the Syrian conflict and reused in their broadcasts dating back to 2021-2022, and ultimately removed or became unavailable from YouTube presences by August/September 2025, after our DMCA enforcement actions (see article: “Phoenix TV used Damascus footage without authorization, despite Fu Xiaotian’s 2015 on-site reporting with a full camera crew, raising questions about the broadcaster's public 'IP respect' claims”) – further research uncovered an even wider pattern of infringement.

Multiple unauthorized reproductions of our Tehran, Iran recordings, including both exclusive drone aerials and ground-level street scenes, inserted as B-roll across separate Phoenix TV productions, e.g. on their principal (former) YouTube channel (unavailable as of Jan 2026). These individual productions were partly also uploaded (as copies) on Phoenix TV's websites fengshows.com and ifeng.com.

Picture: Miroslaw Wawak in Tehran — Original sequence filmed by One Man Wolf Pack ©

*PINNED*2026-01-05 04:00Read the full article »

Phoenix TV used Damascus footage without authorization, despite Fu Xiaotian’s 2015 on-site reporting with a full camera crew, raising questions about the broadcaster's public “IP respect” claims

⚖️ Case Study ⚖️

Phoenix Satellite Television (Phoenix TV) reproduced One Man Wolf Pack's exclusive Damascus footage in multiple Syria productions, despite, according to Phoenix TV’s own reporting, dispatching star anchor Fu Xiaotian to the war-torn capital in late 2015 with professional camera equipment for interviews and location reporting.

The Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) explicitly credited the exclusive Assad interview to the “Chinese PHOENIX TV Channel,” conducted at the former Damascus presidential palace (article publication date: November 22, 2015).

Phoenix TV's very own article (来源:凤凰卫视) on ifeng.com confirms its team's presence at the Omayyad Mosque (“倭马亚清真寺进行采访”), precisely the same location of various reproduced sequences of our works.

Picture: Miroslaw Wawak in Damascus — Original sequence filmed by One Man Wolf Pack ©

*PINNED**UPDATED* 2026-01-01 17:30Read the full article »

We Disassociate Ourselves From Unauthorized Use of Our Footage in State Media Broadcasts and Propaganda

🚨 Update as of 27/09: Reuters’ Epic Fail Deepens — Thai Broadcasters Identify Reuters as Source of Unlicensed Footage »

At One Man Wolf Pack, we dedicate our lives to capturing the beauty of our planet through cinematic, high-resolution drone footage—often filmed in countries we've come to love, respect, and feel deeply connected to. Our content is 100% original and carefully protected by copyright law, with several of our most important works registered with the U.S. Copyright Office.

It is therefore extremely troubling to discover that one of our most personal creations—“🇹🇼 4K Drone Footage TAIPEI 🔥 Capital of Taiwan 🔥🔥🔥 [DJI Phantom 4]”—was used without our knowledge or permission in a series of news reports with clear geopolitical messaging, including military-related broadcasts distributed globally. 🔶 Read the full article on this infringement of our copyright »

*PINNED**UPDATED* 2025-11-26 08:30How our Footage was misused »

⏭️ Coming Next: Further Documented Instances

In upcoming posts and case studies, we will publish further preserved digital evidence (URLs, timestamps, screenshots, and platform records) relating to:

🟥 Documented unauthorized use of our U.S. Copyright Office-registered Taiwan footage in politically framed segments by Phoenix Satellite Television,
🟥 Additional unlicensed uses of our work involving locations including Singapore, Malaysia, and also Macau and mainland China,
🟥 A multi-year timeline of all identified and repeated unauthorized uses,
🟥 More related correspondence and statements made by Phoenix TV, e.g. in DMCA counter-notifications,
🟥 Phoenix TV’s distribution status in Taiwan (as publicly reported since 2022),
🟥 Mass deletions across Phoenix TV-affiliated YouTube channels following our DMCA enforcement,
🟥 Phoenix TV’s YouTube channel rebranding (and the relevant YouTube policy implications) and
🟥 A deep dive into Phoenix TV’s flagship programs — including “Talk With World Leaders” (风云对话), “GBA Discovery” (發現大灣區) and other political/feature formats — and what their repeated reliance on unlicensed creator footage reveals about the broadcaster’s copyright governance and editorial standards.

⚖️ Our documentation continues. As always, we keep this factual record public for accuracy, fairness, and accountability. More updates will follow.

This overview examines Phoenix TV’s repeated unauthorized reproductions of One Man Wolf Pack’s copyrighted footage. Statements of opinion and commentary are based on the documented materials referenced. Furthermore, this overview is based on documented events, personal experiences, and publicly available sources. It is intended as commentary on matters of public interest and copyright protection. No statement herein is intended to accuse any party of unlawful conduct beyond what is factually substantiated. Where legal proceedings are pending or contemplated, no statement is presented as a final judicial determination.

Phoenix Satellite Television case series, Phoenix TV Hong Kong programming analysis, Phoenix TV B-roll footage use, Phoenix TV content sourcing practices, Phoenix TV copyright policy comparison, Phoenix TV program formats analysis, Phoenix TV Talk With World Leaders footage, Phoenix TV News Talk program content, Phoenix TV YouTube publications analysis, Phoenix TV affiliated platforms fengshows ifeng, Hong Kong broadcaster content practices, broadcast B-roll usage analysis, international broadcaster footage sourcing, cross-continental media content usage, multi-year broadcast content pattern, drone footage usage in television programming, cityscape footage use in news media, illustrative B-roll in geopolitical programming, independent creator footage in broadcast media, Miroslaw Wawak One Man Wolf Pack footage, One Man Wolf Pack drone recordings usage, Nairobi drone footage television use, Syria Iran Uruguay Kenya footage analysis, Taiwan Singapore Malaysia Macau China footage use, frame-level comparison broadcast footage, platform records media analysis, documented media case series, broadcast content attribution practices, digital media distribution channels analysis

Our Statement of Disassociation | Chinese Propaganda

Read the full article on this infringement of our copyright »

🟥 Featured on medium.com:
REUTERS EPIC FAIL
»

🟥 Featured on CopyCatTV.com:
How CCTV Lied Under Oath
»

🟥 Phoenix Satellite Television (HK):
Case Series – Full Timeline
»

Drone Footage Licensing One Man Wolf Pack

»Buy 4K Drone RAW Footage
Stock from 160+ Countries | 2026

»Full 4K (Drone) Video List »

Search 🔍

 Search also in description

»News Archive   »Crime Scene Berlin

Quick Links 🔥

»Miroslaw Wawak Social Projects
Supporting the Homeless of Rio de Janeiro

»Miroslaw Wawak @ Netflix

Stadium Drone Footage Licensing One Man Wolf Pack

»Stadium Drone Videos
Arenas Groundhopping

 
Follow The Wolf Pack ★★★★★
Follow the One Man Wolf Pack on YouTube
Follow the One Man Wolf Pack on YouTube
 
 
 

Miroslaw Wawak
One Man Wolf Pack
Paraguay
© Copyright Information


»Full Site Notice | © One Man Wolf Pack 2026

Page Views: 249

»My Tibet Tour with Tibet Vista
»Unauthorized Use of Our Footage in State Media Broadcasts and Propaganda
»Reuters Under Fire for Distributing Chinese Military Propaganda with Copyrighted Drone Footage
»DMCA Abuse, Copyright Theft, and the Great CCTV Scandal
»The Propaganda Has Arrived at Our Doorstep: Brazilian Network RECORD Publishes Chinese Military Propaganda—Depicting Taipei as a Target
»One Man Wolf Pack Brings Down CCTV: A Historic Takedown of State Propaganda by Civilian Copyright Strikes
»Reuters, Record and the Art of Burning Together
»BAND Falls Hard: Brazilian Broadcaster Loses Copyright Lawsuit Over Unauthorized Drone Footage
»Spanish Court Confirms Copyright Infringement by Rafael Delgado García – The Beginning of the End for a Global Content Theft Empire
»Brazilian Court Confirms Copyright Infringement by Carolina Pintos de Britto — Full Victory for One Man Wolf Pack in Landmark Drone Footage Case
»The BAND Network: How One of Brazil’s Biggest Broadcasters Lost a Major YouTube Channel — and Why It Matters
»CGTN: “We Truly Value Your Work”… While Stealing It
»Nippon TV (Japan) & the PLA Propaganda Chain — A Surprising Twist After an Apology
»TyC Sports — Latin America’s Largest Copyright-Theft Operation Keeps Stealing, Even After Being Sued and Nearly Losing Their YouTube Channel
»CopyCatTV.com — Case Study: How CCTV Lied Under Oath in the U.S. DMCA System
»Phoenix TV used Damascus footage without authorization, despite Fu Xiaotian’s 2015 on-site reporting with a full camera crew, raising questions about the broadcaster's public “IP respect” claims
»Phoenix TV’s Unauthorized Reproductions of One Man Wolf Pack’s Iran Footage
»Phoenix TV Reproduced Our Recordings Without Authorization Once More — A Further Case Study in a Long-Standing Pattern of B-Roll Re-Use by the Hong Kong Broadcaster, Mirroring Practices Previously Documented at CCTV
»Phoenix TV Again: Our Authorship Mark Is No Longer Visible in Further Unlicensed Drone Footage Use — The Nairobi, Kenya Case Study
»Phoenix TV Again and Again: Reuse of the Same Nairobi Drone Footage Across Separate Productions (2023–2025) — A Further Case Study of Repeated B-Roll Reproduction by the Hong Kong Broadcaster 鳳凰衛視